[Ftffacilitationteam] Statement on Financing Gender Equality
RosaenCasa en aol.com
RosaenCasa en aol.com
Lun Oct 22 22:26:16 GMT+3 2007
Dear colleagues,
As mentioned in a prior message, here in New York we are preparing for the
Financing for Development (FfD) High Level Dialogue (HLD) in the General
Assembly of the UN. A number of women's organizations have drafted a statement to
circulate at the HLD highlighting some points related to the FfD agenda:
mobilizing domestic and international resources, trade, ODA, debt and systemic
issues. Being that Ana was to be here this week and my involvement in the
process, I am forwarding this statement and appealing to you that we, the
Facilitation Team of the FTF, endorse this statement.
The statement is not comprehensive---it is highlighting some points to
emphasize to Member States and delegates on gender. Mainly, the message is---this
is how you could engender your resolution on FfD at the GA. There is
nothing on gender in the resolution at the moment and we want to push some points
with delegates. They cannot and will not digest a 10 page policy paper---they
prefer easy points to digest and hopefully incorporate into their
statements, resolution inputs and their policy presentations. This document will also
be used to build on later in the FfD process leading up to the UN Commission
on the Status of Women (next March) process which has as its theme, Financing
for Gender Equality, and the lead up to the 6th-year of the FfD conference
in Doha, Qatar next year.
IF YOU APPROVE OF ENDORSING THIS STATEMENT, SEND A QUICK O.K. MESSAGE.
Please reply tomorrow noon. If you don't reply, I'll assume that you are o.k.
with it as well.
Tomorrow if everyone is o.k. with it, we'll add our name to the list of
endorsements. Other women's groups are also reviewing the statement to add their
name tomorrow.
Thanks,
Rosa
Financing for Gender Equality*
Statement to the United Nations General Assembly
High-Level Dialogue on Financing for Development
October 23, 2007
Introduction
In the Monterrey Consensus adopted at the International Conference on
Financing for Development in 2002, UN Member States made a number of commitments to
mobilize and allocate resources for achieving sustainable development,
poverty eradication, gender equality and the empowerment of women. They committed
to mainstreaming “the gender perspective into development policies at all
levels and in all sectors”[para 64], and to reinforcing national efforts aimed
at formulating “social and gender budget policies” [para 19]. Current
preparations for the follow-up review Conference scheduled to take place in Doha in
2008 provide an opportunity to assess progress in meeting these commitments.
Much of the development literature suggests that initiatives on gender
equality and women’s empowerment have not been effectively mainstreamed into
development processes, while women’s machineries and programmes, and the women’s
movement, have been grossly under funded. These proposals highlights a set of
key policy issues that need to be addressed within the financing for
development review process in order to reverse this disastrous trend, and provide
adequate funding and policy support for the social sectors, and for gender
equality and women’s empowerment.
Mobilizing Domestic Resources
Taxation
1. In keeping with pro-poor strategies to achieve the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs), governments should give priority to strengthening tax
administrations and tax collection systems, focusing on progressive direct taxation
on wealth and capital assets rather than VAT on essential consumer items
needed by low-income earners, a majority of which are women. It should be further
recognized that women make significant contributions to care giving from
earned income. The Committee of Experts on International Cooperation on Tax
Matters should study this gender-differentiated dimension of household spending
with a view to making recommendations for suitable tax breaks for women, in
order to take this into account.
Budgets
2. In national policies, priority should be given to effective resource
allocations for achieving the MDGs and other internationally agreed development
goals, including:
* full and productive employment and decent work;
* ensuring access to basic utilities and social services for all;
* ensuring that women have equal access to employment opportunities
and labour market services, and to social services.
3. Gender Responsive Budgeting (GRB) should be adopted as a key tool in
national development strategies, with a view to ensuring that adequate resources,
whether from external aid or domestic revenue, are channeled towards
fulfilling international gender equality and human rights commitments as set out in
the Beijing Platform for Action (BPfA), the Convention on the Elimination of
All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). GRB as a mechanism for
promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment in national policies and
programmes requires specific budgetary allocations, increased funding and a
strengthened mandate for national women’s machineries to build capacity, implement
GRB initiatives, and to monitor and evaluate gender equality outcomes. .
Funding and support are required for adequate gender analysis for effective
policy decisions on the financing of gender programmes.
Accounting for unremunerated work
4. Governments must use methods to measure women's un-paid work and it's
contribution to the national economy through developing and implementing
time-use surveys to make visible the number of hours women spend working versus the
actual income or payment they receive for their work. These methodologies
should be assumed by the National Statistics Offices at the country level as an
instrument to measure poverty, and the results should be included in the
National Accounts Systems. (ECLAC Quito Consensus 2007)
5. These contributions should be costed as investments to the national
economy, and used as a basis for providing matching funds for income generating
activities, for social services and direct support to the care economy, thereby
effectively transferring women’s work from the non-cash to the cash economy.
Mobilizing international resources
6. The expansion and integration of global markets have not been matched
with sufficient protection for the workers and communities that are the victims
of human and trade union rights violations. We consider that a strengthened
global regulatory framework incorporating human rights, labour and
environmental standards is necessary in order to strengthen the protection of human and
workers’ rights, promote gender equality objectives, and safeguard the
environment. Such a framework would draw on the relevant UN and ILO normative
instruments, and provide a common approach to addressing both transnational
business operations and foreign direct investment. We welcome governments’ public
affirmation of the need for such standards.
6bis. Remittances
Recognizing the significant contributions made by migrant remittance flows
to financing development, measures should be adopted to reduce transfer costs,
and avoid double taxation of migrants in host and sending countries.
Development policies should be underpinned by a rights-based approach which protect
the rights of migrant workers, a large proportion of which are women.
Trade
7. Governments must undertake gender impact assessments and reviews of
bilateral, regional and international trade agreements, in order to identify and
redress gender biases in earning levels, job security, conditions of work,
unpaid work burdens and access to productive and natural resources. These
assessments and reviews should also be applied to sector reforms promoted and
financed by multilateral institutions.
Official development assistance
8. Government commitments to reach and maintain the UN target of 0.7% of GNI
in ODA should be adhered to, and a significant share of ODA should be
targeted for women’s empowerment and gender equality. Institutional frameworks at
national levels and among international aid agencies should be engendered and
strengthened with a view to improving aid effectiveness, accountability and
benchmarking for the achievement of gender equality outcomes. Aid policies and
programmes should adhere to the principles of national country ownership and
participation of civil society, including women’s organizations in policy
formulation, implementation and monitoring of results.
9. Within the framework established by the Paris Declaration, there exists a
notable lack of gender analysis and participation of civil society
organizations. Particularly absent are those organizations addressing the issues of
gender equality and the feminization of poverty. Donor budget support and
sector programs frequently are dependent on macroeconomic conditionalities that
aggravate gender inequities. Moreover, the harmonizing of donor practices for
program-based support will most likely result in less space for innovative
approaches and therefore the dilution of gender policies at the ground
level.
10. It is essential to promote an aid architecture that is sensitive to the
realities of those historically bypassed as recipients and without
participation in the process. Real “country ownership” must be the result of
consistent participation on the part of civil society organizations, particularly
women and marginalized groups, who are most affected by poverty.
External debt
11. Given that current debt-restructuring approaches have not liberated
resources for development and in HIPC countries poverty is an epidemic affecting
the majority of its people, most acutely women and children, 100% debt
cancellation is necessary and overdue. Further, governments should initiate a new
and genuine policy space on debt to enable countries to overcome debt
distress. Current policy space is conditioned by current debt relief mechanisms which
do not recognize past failures of HIPC. Genuine policy space should be built
around analysis that provides additional resources to help countries meet
the Millennium Development Goals and Beijing Platform for Action. (see 2007
Report of the Secretary-General on FfD, paras 97-102).
Systemic issues
UN gender equality architecture
12. Governments must support a stronger gender equality architecture at the
UN to enable governments and the UN system to better achieve their
commitments to gender equality, women's empowerment and human rights. The proposed new
women's entity needs a strong, combined mandate on normative and operational
functions to ensure effective delivery, including through the expansion of
its programmes on the ground to improve women's lives. Donors should commit to
mobilizing the resources required to fund the new entity at a minimum level
of $500 million USD.
* Endorsing organizations: Women’s Environment and Development Organization
(WEDO), International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), International
Presentation Association of the Sisters of the Presentation, Education and
Networking for Latina Cooperation and Empowerment (ENLACE), UNANIMA International,
International Women’s Anthropology Conference (IWAC).
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: http://listas.chasque.net/pipermail/ftffacilitationteam/attachments/20071022/fb387b38/attachment-0001.html
Más información sobre la lista de distribución Ftffacilitationteam